From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from r-finger.com ([178.79.160.5]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQbVA-0003nG-3Z for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:14:26 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host81-153-114-169.range81-153.btcentralplus.com [81.153.114.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3A7C99A4 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:00:48 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50866ACF.8010105@r-finger.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:00:47 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <50865F91.5060002@r-finger.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libxkbcommon: New window system-independent xkb library X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:14:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23/10/12 10:15, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On 23 October 2012 20:12, Tomas Frydrych wrote: >> I think this needs a -native tools as well, like, >> https://github.com/Guacamayo/meta-guacamayo/blob/master/meta-guacamayo/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxkbcommon_git.bb > > Not anymore, we use Python for makekeys nowadays. (And, in an > unpushed tree, don't use Python at all if we can avoid it.) Good news, but perhaps you forgot to push this into the public repo? makekeys seems to be C program even in the current master, certainly in 1c880887666f84e08ea1752bb8a5ab2a7bf1d8a0. Tomas