From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TT93w-0004Ni-8F for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:28:48 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46154 helo=eumx.net) by eumx.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TT8qm-0002CC-9b for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:15:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=message-id :date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=nJuKLoZAGd+Q2osmQ4vZKs wApO4=; b=AvJt7k2abzmIDMrg2iRw7CT4L2UKB4pvcbmb+BXaGBKdnsDPpBVoEG 3qpQYXdcvVB5E1SLbmoZP96K2MNEgnUcI5wZPOKoTgevZqu3SE4jj63KMLB/m0ib rA5YFsxJOjtjlc9B0nz2MD5z4+v2u5aYti0eKYCCZk0KzRWgnFa+Y= Received: from [195.171.99.130] (port=60510 helo=[192.168.0.60]) by eumx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TT8qm-0002C9-7O for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:15:12 +0000 Message-ID: <508FA924.4030301@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:17:08 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121012 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Removing netbase from an image X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:28:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am attempting to remove netbase from a custom image. I would like to replace it with connman. I have added connman through EXTRA_IMAGE_INSTALL, however netbase is brought in via packagegroup-core-boot.bb which funnily enough has some very important features and I would like to keep. What would be the best way to make this replacement. Should I copy packagegroup-core-boot.bb and keep a local copy, while keeping it in sync manually? Alternatively, I notice quite a few packages in packagegroup-core-boot have a VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_* define. Would it be worth having a VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_network ?= "netbase" which could be overridden? Thoughts? -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --