From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell@eumx.net>
Cc: "open >> 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] upstream_tracking: Update for 1.4 Planning
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 06:01:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509A69D2.4000500@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509A61A1.50306@eumx.net>
On 11/07/2012 05:26 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 07/11/12 13:14, Saul Wold wrote:
>> The following need updating based on this review:
>> kconfig-frontends
>> libcheck
>> sqlite3
>> libmad
>> less
>> sysstat
>> psmisc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc | 58
>> ++++++++++----------
>> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc
>> b/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc
>> index fd422cf..7140477 100644
>> --- a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc
>> +++ b/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc
>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ RECIPE_UPSTREAM_VERSION_pn-bluez4="4.101"
>> RECIPE_UPSTREAM_DATE_pn-bluez4="Jun 22, 2012"
>> CHECK_DATE_pn-bluez4 = "Aug 27, 2012"
>> RECIPE_UPSTREAM_VERSION_pn-boost = "1.51.0"
>> -CHECK_DATE_pn-boost = "Aug 27, 2012"
>> +CHECK_DATE_pn-boost = "Nov 02, 2012"
>> RECIPE_UPSTREAM_DATE_pn-boost = "Aug 20, 2012"
>> RECIPE_UPSTREAM_VERSION_pn-btrfs-tools="git"
>> RECIPE_UPSTREAM_VERSION_pn-busybox = "1.20.2"
>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ RECIPE_UPSTREAM_DATE_pn-connman="Aug 22, 2012"
>> CHECK_DATE_pn-connman = "Aug 28, 2012"
> [snip]
>
> Hi Saul,
>
> How is this maintainers file intended to work? The reason I ask is that
> ConnMan is quite outdated (1.4) and the latest version (1.9) includes
> some very nice features such as CLI configuration.
>
This should have gone to the Poky mailing list, I was a little too quick
to send it here.
There are two files one, maintainers.inc and the other upstream_tracking
this is used to keep track of the up stream version.
The idea is that this file is where you can go to see who is maintaining
the recipe, this does not mean we will not accept patch, upgrades or ...
from other to recipes. It's intended as a fallback if no one else updates.
Connman was probably delayed in getting updated because the 1.3 release
was happening.
> I don't want to try and find time to do it, if it is already in progress
> somewhere or is intended to be imminently updated.
>
I can't say how imminent it is, you can check with the person
maintaining it, that would be: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com>
Sau!
> Cheers,
> Jack.
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-07 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-07 13:14 [PATCH 1/2] maintainers: Update file with missing maintainers Saul Wold
2012-11-07 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] upstream_tracking: Update for 1.4 Planning Saul Wold
[not found] ` <509A61A1.50306@eumx.net>
2012-11-07 14:01 ` Saul Wold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509A69D2.4000500@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jack.mitchell@eumx.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox