From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbSQ6-0004th-B5 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:46:06 +0100 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2012 00:31:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,299,1352102400"; d="scan'208";a="250959391" Received: from lpalcu-linux (HELO [10.237.105.165]) ([10.237.105.165]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2012 00:31:52 -0800 Message-ID: <50ADE2F7.4070904@intel.com> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:31:51 +0200 From: Laurentiu Palcu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <7f73d8a0aee08a41e949ec7a1297f5edbf12ed57.1352898505.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> <20121121162051.GK12637@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20121121162051.GK12637@jama.jama.net> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] xf86-video-omap: add new recipe to follow the maintained repo X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:46:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/21/2012 06:20 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:21:10PM +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: >> > This new recipe is needed because the old driver is unmaintained. This >> > new recipe will follow the new repo. > On which MACHINE did you test this? Here it fails in do_configure with: > | configure:18796: result: yes > | configure:18808: checking whether to include DRI support > | configure:18812: checking for /usr/include/xorg/dri.h > | configure:18818: error: cannot check for file existence when cross compiling > > So I'm wondering if it was tested at all. > Martin, I remember that I clearly mentioned, in the cover letter, the commit upon which I applied the patches before compiling the nightlies for all architectures. Here it is: "The yocto autobuilder nightlies (x86/x86_64/ppc/arm/mips) compiled successfully. Compilations were done on top of the following commit: 78983e939ab17f02f8911c8b0d0e326b419856b9." At the moment I was working on the xorg upgrades this was the last commit... Did you try the patches on top of this commit? Does the compilation fail? Thanks, Laurentiu