From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfQr9-0001VD-Bf for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:54:24 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2012 23:40:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,204,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="175307540" Received: from unknown (HELO swold-linux.bigsur.com) ([10.255.13.44]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2012 23:40:00 -0800 Message-ID: <50BC5750.6080300@linux.intel.com> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:40:00 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <59c6eb39edcf9308a81c9ad84f248e30e526f6ba.1354480962.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <778e45862ea1d877e03abf4b29468fddbe388107.1354480962.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <50BC2C87.9090905@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] util-linux: Update from 2.21 -> 2.22 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:54:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/02/2012 09:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Saul Wold > wrote: > > 2.21 has some linking issues with gold on uclibc where mount > program does not work. Its some sort of underlinking. > > 2.22 did not solve that problem completely either > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > meta/recipes-core/util-linux/__util-linux.inc | 18 > +++++++++++------- > .../util-linux/add-aarch64-__support.patch | 4 ++-- > .../util-linux/uclibc-____progname-conflict.patch | 14 > +++++++------- > .../util-linux-ng-replace-__siginterrupt.patch | 14 > +++++++------- > .../{util-linux_2.21.2.bb => > util-linux_2.22.bb } | 8 +++----- > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-core/util-linux/{__util-linux_2.21.2.bb > => util-linux_2.22.bb > } (88%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-__linux/util-linux.inc > b/meta/recipes-core/util-__linux/util-linux.inc > index f2f9a04..00b332a 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-__linux/util-linux.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-__linux/util-linux.inc > @@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ SECTION = "base" > LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+ & BSD" > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://README.licensing;md5=__9c920d811858a74b67a36ba23cbaa9__5f \ > - > file://COPYING;md5=__59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f65__52 \ > - > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.GPLv2;md5=__8ca43cbc842c2336e835926c2166c2__8b \ > - > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.LGPLv2.1;md5=__bbb461211a33b134d42ed5ee802b37__ff \ > + > file://COPYING;md5=__b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42__63 \ > + > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.GPLv2;md5=__b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42__63 \ > + > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.LGPLv2.1;md5=__4fbd65380cdd255951079008b36451__6c \ > > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.BSD-3;md5=__58dcd8452651fc8b07d1f65ce07ca8__af > \ > - > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.UCB;md5=__263860f8968d8bafa5392cab742852__62 \ > - > file://getopt/COPYING;md5=__c3a41733416fb80af7ba1b7e1f7125__51" > + > file://Documentation/licenses/__COPYING.UCB;md5=__263860f8968d8bafa5392cab742852__62" > > inherit autotools gettext pkgconfig > DEPENDS = "zlib ncurses" > DEPENDS_append_class-native = " lzo-native" > +DEPENDS_append_class-target = " libpam" > > > Forgot to ask in my other email, why the dependency on libpam here? > Should this not be under a check for pam in DISTRO_FEATURES? > > > it did not build without pam. Try it out may be I was wrong. Seemed to work fine for me with Poky, was this a non-distro setting? Sau!