From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgIPr-0002x3-NO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:05:47 +0100 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2012 08:50:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,223,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="252438903" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.13.60]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2012 08:51:21 -0800 Message-ID: <50BF7B88.6060309@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:51:20 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <1354723571.1715.17.camel@empanada> <1354724873.25268.119.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1354724873.25268.119.camel@ted> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Cc: linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:05:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/05/2012 08:27 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 10:06 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:48 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> On 21 November 2012 21:32, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> atom-pc should probably be using the 3.4 kernel, but that's a >>>> question for Darren/Tom/Nitin (so I've added them to the cc), since >>>> there may be a reason (with respect to graphics) as to why it is on >>>> 3.0. >>> >>> Ping Darren/Tom/Nitin. >>> >>> atom-pc is certainly lagging behind by still being on 3.0, and I can't >>> see any reason why we'd want to stick with 3.0 for graphics. In fact >>> as the most common graphics driver used on atom-pc is a i965 we want a >>> modern kernel as that is where the development is. >>> >> >> I don't know of any technical reason for it to still be at 3.0. >> >> Until recently all of the 'core machines' were at 3.0 and probably the >> assumption was that whoever upgraded those in the past would also be >> upgrading atom-pc - has that changed?. >> >> So who does own the core machines and if that doesn't cover atom-pc, >> then who owns that? > > As I understood it, WR owns the non-IA core machines, you (as in the > Intel team) own the IA ones, namely atom-pc. Agreed, it should be updated. Tom, Nitin, and I will discuss and select an owner. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel