From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: "Andreas Müller" <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
Cc: Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ICU: add pkgconfig support
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:59:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C69367.7000801@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALbNGRT1RmSpKaH9ZJf+aaDoNddqgQckUR2BK8sYCc3em4b-8A@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/10/2012 05:07 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 12/10/2012 08:48 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2012 12:46 AM, Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote:
>>>>
<SNIP>
>>>> "
>>>> SRC_URI = "${BASE_SRC_URI} \
>>>> file://noldlibpath.patch \
>>>> @@ -28,6 +29,12 @@ inherit autotools pkgconfig binconfig
>>>> do_configure() {
>>>> libtoolize --force
>>>> gnu-configize --force
>>>> + if [ "${PN}" != "icu-native" ]; then
>>>> + OLD=`pwd`
>>>> + cd ${S}
>>>> + autoconf
>>>> + cd ${OLD}
>>>> + fi
>>
>>
>> I had some time this morning to investigate this more deeply. What I found
>> was that the ICU tarball was being delivered with a "configure" and that the
>> do_configure was avoiding the "autoconf" conversion of configure.in ->
>> configure. I am not sure if this is historical or if this is truly needed.
>>
>> So by doing the autoconf above you changed the "configure" script, this in
>> turn caused some configuration changes to occur in the platform.h file. Why
>> these changed (particularly the U_HAVE_NAMESPACE define) then caused the ICU
>> libraries to be built with different namespace.
>>
>> So a couple of key questions that need to be resolved:
>> 1) Will updating to 4.6 solve this issue, if not then we need to dive into 2
>> + 3 Below:
>>
>> 2) Why does icu tarball have a generated configure?
>>
>> 3) Why does the autoconf generated configure fail to configure things
>> correctly?
>>
>> Sau!
>>
> Also got this error but reported it to the wrong mailing list - sorry.
> I also looked around for this. The patch added pkg-config to icu. Just
> a guess: webkit-gtk fails due to a mixture of renamed symbols
> (EventListener_3_6 - see sysroot/usr/include/unicode/urename.h) and
> unrenamed symbols. Before the icu-patch this did not happen because
> (icu's) urename.h was not included and no symbols were renamed or
> renamed differently. My problem: The error gives me information about
> renamed symbol but I did not yet find the time to search for
> unrenamed. As I said: Just a guess
>
I am not sure that's it, the renaming is actually in the NAMESPACE, the
older (no pkg-config) sets HAVE_NAMESPACE in the platform.h file and
then the symbols have icu_2_6 in them, that's the real issue, which is
caused by running autoconf and getting a bad/wrong "configure" script vs
the one suplied in the tarball.
Sau!
> Andreas
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-11 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-03 10:42 [PATCH 0/4] [V2] Add pkgconfig support to four packages Qi.Chen
2012-12-03 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] libksba: add pkgconfig support Qi.Chen
2012-12-03 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] ICU: " Qi.Chen
2012-12-03 11:50 ` Burton, Ross
2012-12-04 2:04 ` ChenQi
2012-12-10 16:48 ` Saul Wold
2012-12-10 21:44 ` Saul Wold
2012-12-11 1:07 ` Andreas Müller
2012-12-11 1:59 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2012-12-12 8:48 ` ChenQi
2012-12-12 8:58 ` ChenQi
2012-12-11 2:05 ` ChenQi
2012-12-03 10:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] pth: " Qi.Chen
2012-12-03 10:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] libassuan: " Qi.Chen
2012-12-04 8:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] [V3] Add pkgconfig support to four packages ChenQi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-26 9:36 [PATCH 0/4] " Qi.Chen
2012-11-26 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] icu: add pkgconfig support Qi.Chen
2012-11-26 10:56 ` Burton, Ross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C69367.7000801@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=schnitzeltony@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox