From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGxZ-00088H-Uh for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 00:46:01 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 15:30:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,412,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="187856185" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.122]) ([10.255.14.122]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 15:30:32 -0800 Message-ID: <50E76618.40400@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:30:32 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Lindqvist References: <1357245391-11055-1-git-send-email-cazfi74@gmail.com> <50E755FE.90604@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Prepare recipes for automake-1.13 (batch 1) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:46:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/04/2013 03:11 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 5 January 2013 00:42, Marko Lindqvist wrote: >> On 5 January 2013 00:21, Saul Wold wrote: >>> On 01/03/2013 12:36 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: >>>> >>>> In practice there is three categories of changes in automake-1.13 >>>> that cause packages to break. From that follows that virtually all >>>> problems fall to three categories, and all packages suffering from >>>> problem of the same category get virtually identical fix. >>>> >>> So these need the automake-1.13 update first? I have the 1.12 version but >>> have not seen the 1.13 version yet. >>> >>> Just want to confirm that. >> >> No, the other way around. These are needed in place before we can >> even consider automake-1.13. They are compatible with several versions >> back. > > I've of course tested them with both automake-1.13 openembedded > (patch for this update not submitted. If someone else needs it, I can > of course send it) and against current master automake 1.12. > > Ok got it, and ack on the Git repo for now email patches are fine, I need to sort out the current batch (which pre-dates these) and then I can concentrate on the next set. Sau! > - ML > >