From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tri6T-0008Ri-4m for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 05:45:03 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2013 20:29:48 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,418,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="188123027" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.104]) ([10.255.14.104]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2013 20:29:48 -0800 Message-ID: <50E8FDBB.5080500@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:29:47 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Lindqvist References: In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL (V2) 00/35] Updates, Multilib Patches and other fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 04:45:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/04/2013 10:52 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 5 January 2013 08:22, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> Saul Wold (3): >> glib-2.0: Update to 2.35.3 > > Is there some specific need for bleeding edge (unstable development snapshot)? > I was updating glib-networking and it required glib 2.35.3, I had not checked (my bad that it was unstable). Even after a number of years, I loose track sometimes of what's stable vs unstable (odd vs .99 vs ??) We can drop both the glib and glib-networking patches. Sau! > > > - ML >