From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: update-modules, do we need it anymore?
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:59:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EEC93F.9060802@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkTA4NFq_EoFY8H800ewKQMWEOMjfroqT0t3okRKJz5jEYZzw@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/10/2013 03:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
> <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com <mailto:laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While working on making all postinstalls run on host, I saw that we
> still use update-modules script. However, neither the kmod modprobe nor
> the busybox one read /etc/modules.conf file anymore which is created by
> update-modules script. Both scan /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf files.
>
> So, does anybody know why do we still have it around? Most modern
> distributions declared update-modules as obsolete and /etc/modules.conf
> doesn't exist anymore. Am I missing something?
>
>
> I've been using the autoload functionality (not heavily, but from time
> to time)
> that is currently tied to update-modules. I did a quick scan of the
> alternatives
> in oe-core, and didn't immediately see that the same thing is possible via
> kmod. Is that the case, or am I missing something as well ?
This autoload functionality seems to be provided by
/etc/init.d/modutils.sh which is explicitly called from update-modules
script. However, modutils.sh resides in modutils-initscripts.bb recipe.
So, I personally see not use for update-modules anymore...
Thanks,
Laurentiu
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Laurentiu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>
>
> --
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-08 14:41 update-modules, do we need it anymore? Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-08 14:50 ` Phil Blundell
2013-01-10 13:45 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-01-10 13:59 ` Laurentiu Palcu [this message]
2013-01-10 14:10 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-01-10 14:24 ` Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-10 14:57 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EEC93F.9060802@intel.com \
--to=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox