Re: [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 01/18/2013 06:34 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On my build no copy of gcc/opkg-utils was archived. For gcc it is
> bad as libgcc will end up in the image and the sources should be
> provided. Update the method and comment to not exclude the native
> version of the build.

I understand what the issue is here, but I am not sure this is the right 
solution. This will likely bring in way more than is wanted or needed 
for source archiving.

What's needed from the opkg-utils-native?

Sau!


> ---
>   meta/classes/archiver.bbclass |    4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> index a4a2158..516f947 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> @@ -187,11 +187,11 @@ def get_applying_patches(d):
>
>   def not_tarball(d):
>       """
> -    packages including key words 'work-shared', 'native', 'packagegroup-' will be passed
> +    packages including key words 'work-shared', 'packagegroup-' will be passed
>       """
>       workdir = d.getVar('WORKDIR', True)
>       s = d.getVar('S', True)
> -    if 'work-shared' in s or 'packagegroup-' in workdir or 'native' in workdir:
> +    if 'work-shared' in s or 'packagegroup-' in workdir:
>           return True
>       else:
>           return False
>