Re: [PATCH 04/10] systemd: add systemd recipes

Burton, Ross
2013-01-21T12:23:50Z

On 20 January 2013 23:11, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at diff between oe-core systemd recipe and meta-systemd, can you
> explain why python support got disabled.

I'll delegate that to Radu who did the bulk of the systemd recipe
integration... if it's actually useful we can bring it back.

> And why are there diffs like:
> - /libstemd-udevd \
> + /lib/udev/udevd \
> + /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd \
> (the later is meta-systemd).

Clearly a typo from backspacing a little too much... Patch sent to
fix this. Note that I removed the compat symlink as the initramfs
handles the systemd udev now.

> Is there some plan to send patches for meta-systemd to remove bits merged
> to oe-core? Right now a lot of stuff is not parsing due to removed
> dbus-systemd package.

I see you've already sent a patch for this - anything else massively breaking?

Ross