Re: [PATCH 00/10] Initial systemd integration

Saul Wold
2013-01-21T17:13:21Z

On 01/21/2013 04:12 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 January 2013 03:30, Ciprian Ciubotariu <cheepeero@gmx.net> wrote:
>> However, with oe-core/meta providing a default embedded policy, higher
>> layers need to remove sysvinit or systemd stuff from base recipes, which is
>> against bitbake's additive language design (only append/prepend functions,
>> no -= operator) and against separating concerns.
>
> If you don't do a systemd build, you won't get any of the systemd
> files. Ditto, sysvinit (well, that's the goal - as it was an
> assumption until now that needs work still).
>
> An oe-core without *any* init system will be very cumbersome - every
> service will need a bbappend to actually work, with the subsequent
> maintenance costs.
>
Ouch, I thought that this was one of the goals of the select your init
system, ie don't use either sysvinit or systemd. Poky-Tiny has a single
file rc.local script to do the initialization of the system.

Sau!

> Ross
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>