From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from atl4mhfb02.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.56]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Txifw-0000M3-MB for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:34:56 +0100 Received: from atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.46]) by atl4mhfb02.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MIH78Z015373 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:17:08 -0500 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MIH5X5011252 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:17:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 29539 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jan 2013 18:17:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.14?) (mike@milosoftware.com@85.150.144.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 22 Jan 2013 18:17:05 -0000 Message-ID: <50FED7A0.1060200@topic.nl> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:17:04 +0100 From: Mike Looijmans Organization: Topic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <3d6b90b5ad79166eda3883ad4e9d5ca1ed937f10.1358836314.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <3d6b90b5ad79166eda3883ad4e9d5ca1ed937f10.1358836314.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/6] image.bbclass: add a hook funtion to support readonly rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:34:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/22/2013 07:36 AM, Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote: > From: Chen Qi > > read_only_rootfs_hook: this funtion is invoked only if 'read-only-rootfs' > is in IMAGE_FEATURES. It tweaks some basic files and makes populate- > volatile.sh script run at rootfs time. To me, it seems running populate-volatile at rootfs is a good thing for writable rootfs as well, it reduces the writing at first boot. Why not ALWAYS do this? -- Mike Looijmans - Topic Automation