From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Txl0Y-0000YG-SU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:03:54 +0100 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2013 12:48:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,516,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="275335168" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.15.13]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2013 12:48:19 -0800 Message-ID: <50FEFB12.5060905@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:48:18 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurentiu Palcu References: <81a1810d4c60fe2648c4e34d64c63ced7e0a7296.1358432402.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <81a1810d4c60fe2648c4e34d64c63ced7e0a7296.1358432402.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel.bbclass: remove references to update-modules X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:03:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/17/2013 06:58 AM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > Since update-modules is now obsolete, remove it from the bbclass. > > [YOCTO #3598] > > Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu > --- > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 36 +++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > index 46ba55f..4893cf2 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > inherit linux-kernel-base module_strip > > PROVIDES += "virtual/kernel" > -DEPENDS += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc kmod-native virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} update-modules" > +DEPENDS += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc kmod-native virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX}" > ... > - use_update_modules = oe.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'update-modules', True, False, d) > - if use_update_modules: > - postinst = d.getVar('pkg_postinst_modules', True) > - postrm = d.getVar('pkg_postrm_modules', True) > - else: > - postinst = None > - postrm = None > + postinst = d.getVar('pkg_postinst_modules', True) > + postrm = d.getVar('pkg_postrm_modules', True) This seems to be inverted logic from the original. If update-modules is removed, then use_update_modules should be false right? Which would have previously set postinst and postrm to None. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel