From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel.bbclass: remove references to update-modules
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:22:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FF9DDB.7040807@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FEFB12.5060905@linux.intel.com>
On 01/22/2013 10:48 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> - use_update_modules = oe.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'update-modules', True, False, d)
>> > - if use_update_modules:
>> > - postinst = d.getVar('pkg_postinst_modules', True)
>> > - postrm = d.getVar('pkg_postrm_modules', True)
>> > - else:
>> > - postinst = None
>> > - postrm = None
>> > + postinst = d.getVar('pkg_postinst_modules', True)
>> > + postrm = d.getVar('pkg_postrm_modules', True)
> This seems to be inverted logic from the original. If update-modules is
> removed, then use_update_modules should be false right? Which would have
> previously set postinst and postrm to None.
I believe both the previous and current logic are right:
* Before, the update-modules script was called in the postinst/postrm.
So, when the update-modules package was not part of the build, the
postinst/postrm could not call update-modules anymore. As a consequence,
they were set to none.
* After update-modules has been removed, we are not constrained by
calling update-modules anymore in postinst/postrm but we can safely call
depmod to have the dependencies computed.
So, is there anything wrong with the current logic?
Thanks,
Laurentiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 14:58 [PATCH 0/6] Remove obsolete update-modules Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-17 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] modutils-initscripts: improve modutils.sh Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-17 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] orinoco-conf: remove dependencies of update-modules Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-17 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] hostap-conf: " Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-17 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] module.bbclass: do not use update-modules anymore Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-17 14:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] kernel.bbclass: remove references to update-modules Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-17 15:26 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-01-22 20:48 ` Darren Hart
2013-01-23 8:22 ` Laurentiu Palcu [this message]
2013-01-23 16:24 ` Darren Hart
2013-01-17 14:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] bitbake.conf: remove update-modules from DISTRO_FEATURES Laurentiu Palcu
2013-01-18 13:10 ` [PATCH 0/6] Remove obsolete update-modules Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FF9DDB.7040807@intel.com \
--to=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox