From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TyHyH-0007eK-LS for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:15:47 +0100 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0O6S6ki011105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.207] (128.224.162.207) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.318.4; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:28:06 -0800 Message-ID: <5100D477.9040305@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:28:07 +0800 From: Pascal Ouyang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1358908276-14786-1-git-send-email-Xin.Ouyang@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130124142807474 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.windriver.com id r0O6S6ki011105 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libcgroup: fix the QA issue for pam_cgroup.so* X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:15:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B401=E6=9C=8823=E6=97=A5 20:00, Burton, Ross =E5=86=99= =E9=81=93: > On 23 January 2013 02:31, Xin Ouyang wrote: >> pam modules in ${base_libdir}/security/ should be binary .so files, >> not symlinks. So fix this QA issue. > > The short log should explain the problem more than just "fix QA issue". > > The commit log also doesn't say anything about moving libcgroup from > /usr/lib to /lib. Also isn't just setting --libdir in EXTRA_OEMAKE > cleaner? You know pam_cgroup.so is installed into ${base_libdir}/security, this=20 will cause "unsafe-references-in-binaries" QA issue if libcgroup.so.0 is=20 installed into ${libdir}. I will add this reason in V2. I do not use --libdir because pkgconfig/dev-so files should always=20 installed into ${libdir} instead of ${base_libdir}. > > Finally, no PR bumps are needed in oe-core. Why no PR bumps needed? Thanks. :) - Pascal > > Ross > > --=20 - Pascal