From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module-base.bbclass: Call make instead of oe_runmake in do_make_scripts
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:43:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5106C6ED.2090204@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359269665-1843-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com>
On 01/26/2013 10:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> This makes the external module compilation a bit more robust for
> cases where external module recipes may be passing extra params
> to make via EXTRA_OEMAKE, and more that often one needs to pass
s/that/than/ (this honestly through me a bit :-)
> M=$(PWD) when building external modules and if we use EXTRA_OEMAKE
> that would mean that it would appear in do_make_scripts as well
> and since we are only changing the reference kernel src tree here
> it will not run the make scripts in desired directory.
>
> It is also well explained in top makefile in kernel tree around
> line# 1335 in 3.4
>
> |else # KBUILD_EXTMOD
> |
> |###
> |# External module support.
> |# When building external modules the kernel used as basis is considered
> |# read-only, and no consistency checks are made and the make
> |# system is not used on the basis kernel. If updates are required
> |# in the basis kernel ordinary make commands (without M=...) must
> |# be used.
>
> Therefore passing M=... will not do the updates in the basis
> kernel as expected with 'make scripts' so we have to bypass EXTRA_OEMAKE
>
> [Yocto #3787]
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Khem!
--
Darren
> ---
> meta/classes/module-base.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> index cfee50a..9dbb4b4 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> #
> do_make_scripts() {
> unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS
> - oe_runmake CC="${KERNEL_CC}" LD="${KERNEL_LD}" AR="${KERNEL_AR}" \
> + make CC="${KERNEL_CC}" LD="${KERNEL_LD}" AR="${KERNEL_AR}" \
> -C ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} scripts
> }
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-28 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-27 6:54 [PATCH] module-base.bbclass: Call make instead of oe_runmake in do_make_scripts Khem Raj
2013-01-28 18:43 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2013-01-28 19:11 ` Khem Raj
2013-01-28 20:03 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5106C6ED.2090204@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox