From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.mlbassoc.com ([65.100.170.105] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3213-0001f0-7G for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:14:17 +0100 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 621C8F811E0; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 02:58:19 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1D9F81199; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 02:58:18 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <5112293F.4080503@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:58:23 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1359990723-21304-1-git-send-email-constantinx.musca@intel.com> <5110DF13.7010502@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] netbase: split up in netbase and init-ifupdown X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:14:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote: >>> >>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services >>> and the hosts file >>> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package >>> (init-ifupdown) >> >> >> What is the benefit of such an intrusive change? >> Why not just have the netbase recipe create a separate package? > > Many images use different network managers so ifupdown might not be > need; thus the split. Is it what you're concerned about? The massive renames and new recipe. I think it should be possible to split the ifup/ifdown functions and keep the 'netbase' recipe. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------