From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5BB3-0002e4-CF for Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:25:21 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2013 00:09:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,647,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="255786285" Received: from lpalcu-linux (HELO [10.237.105.165]) ([10.237.105.165]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2013 00:09:14 -0800 Message-ID: <5119F8A9.8080603@intel.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:09:13 +0200 From: Laurentiu Palcu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Wessel References: <1360624949-43859-1-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <1360624949-43859-1-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] relocate_sdk.py: improvements X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:25:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/12/2013 01:22 AM, Jason Wessel wrote: > Now that I have had to debug the SDK relocator on multiple occasions > I figure it might be nice to get the patches upstreamed. But, before that, did you see my comments on the previous patchset? It looks like they went unnoticed as they were not addressed. Here is what I replied to your previous patches: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-January/034868.html http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-January/034869.html Thanks, Laurentiu