From: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: OE-core] How do I find out why are packages being rebuilt?
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:14:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51222923.8040104@topic.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LbTZWh7-S3i+GmcPHDoRaRTN6BUniBcoX5_=eE6j21AuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/18/2013 12:11 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 18 February 2013 11:04, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl> wrote:
>> I'm still having trouble with packages being needlessly rebuilt over and
>> over. The worst of all it qt4-embedded, it takes about an hour to build.
>> This is wasting a LOT of time.
>>
>> The classic OE never rebuilt a package until its version changed.
>
> oe-core uses checksums of dependencies to determine what to rebuild -
> so if a class you inherit changes it's populate_packages_prepend()
> then the package task will re-execute, or if a dependeny package
> rebuilds then your package will rebuild too. If you're tracking
> oe-core master then this often means large rebuilds as there may have
> been changes to the base.bbclass or package.bbclass which obviously
> impacts everything, and the usual churn in the packages.
>
> bitbake-diffsigs will let you follow the signature differences that
> cause a rebuild up the tree to identify what has changed.
Change in oe-core I can live with. Things that puzzle me are that when I
change the location of a bootloader data file in my local.conf, it
suddenly decides to rebuild qt4-embedded. I also have two almost
identical machines (same cpu, same kernel, just a few different plugs),
and I cannot figure out why it builds two separate qt4 binaries.
So I want to diagnose that. I have no idea where to start.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 9:29 Multiple MACHINE building is broken in OE-core? Mike Looijmans
2013-01-29 9:40 ` Martin Jansa
2013-01-29 10:21 ` Mike Looijmans
2013-01-29 10:48 ` Burton, Ross
[not found] ` <510B73EB.8060907@topic.nl>
[not found] ` <CAJTo0LbkOMXqZkHd-JAcNKxiOmXTy+TXPEEJ-CkPc1Jx3Ujekg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-02-01 12:59 ` Mike Looijmans
2013-02-01 14:00 ` Burton, Ross
2013-02-09 19:39 ` Mike Looijmans
2013-02-10 14:55 ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-10 19:02 ` Mike Looijmans
2013-02-10 19:59 ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-18 11:04 ` OE-core] How do I find out why are packages being rebuilt? Mike Looijmans
2013-02-18 11:11 ` Burton, Ross
2013-02-18 13:14 ` Mike Looijmans [this message]
2013-02-18 13:19 ` Burton, Ross
2013-02-18 17:28 ` Martin Jansa
2013-01-29 11:27 ` Multiple MACHINE building is broken in OE-core? Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51222923.8040104@topic.nl \
--to=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox