From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9Eof-0004I2-41 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:07:01 +0100 Message-ID: <5128B95D.5070305@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:43:09 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <1361563821-7683-1-git-send-email-cristian.iorga@intel.com> <7EF31BEB21E340DBAFB08ABD4321A269@intel.com> <5128858F.1030107@communistcode.co.uk> <3284634.41HXpyBOqa@helios> In-Reply-To: <3284634.41HXpyBOqa@helios> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] connman: enable connman client X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:07:02 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:07:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/23/13 11:30, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Saturday 23 February 2013 09:02:07 Jack Mitchell wrote: >> On 02/23/13 08:34, Ross Burton wrote: >>> Also the fact that you have to do this is depressing. I wonder why >>> upstream doesn't want to install any of the tools? >> Connmanctl is a helper, even though I have connman in my image, I >> wouldn't want connmanctl. I assume this is why they don't ship it by >> default; as my use case is fairly normal for connman. > I would have thought if you had asked for the client to be built (or not asked > for it not to be built, as the case may be) then surely you would want it > installed (as far as make install goes anyway)? Yes I misread, I thought we were explicity enabling it. I'll try to send an email off to upstream and see what they think. > >> Which leads to the next point, this should be a seperate package. > Probably should be I think yes. If no one beats me to it I'll look into this at work next week. Some of the tools should be split into packages too and I think there may be some distro specific tweaks also (e.g. wifi enabled etc). > > Cheers, > Paul >