From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAhgt-0002xm-A8 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:09:07 +0100 Message-ID: <512E0FA9.3030007@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:52:41 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <512E0E4E.8060205@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <512E0E4E.8060205@communistcode.co.uk> Subject: Re: GCC + Texinfo 5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:09:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27/02/13 13:46, Jack Mitchell wrote: > As with the recent binutils texinfo5 compatibility I believe GCC now > also has the same failings, please see attached log. > > I've had a quick look for patches but I am not at all familiar with > the GCC development process and I came up empty handed. > > Cheers, > Ok, one patch found, there seems to be some @anchor problems too; I'll see if I can dig anything up. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-07/msg00045.html -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --