From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAhkz-00034s-HD for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:13:17 +0100 Message-ID: <512E10A8.2080407@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:56:56 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <512E0E4E.8060205@communistcode.co.uk> <512E0FA9.3030007@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <512E0FA9.3030007@communistcode.co.uk> Subject: Re: GCC + Texinfo 5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:13:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27/02/13 13:52, Jack Mitchell wrote: > On 27/02/13 13:46, Jack Mitchell wrote: >> As with the recent binutils texinfo5 compatibility I believe GCC now >> also has the same failings, please see attached log. >> >> I've had a quick look for patches but I am not at all familiar with >> the GCC development process and I came up empty handed. >> >> Cheers, >> > > Ok, one patch found, there seems to be some @anchor problems too; I'll > see if I can dig anything up. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-07/msg00045.html > Appologies, that isn't even for GCC :( -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --