From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAiYu-0004zB-Cz for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:05:08 +0100 Message-ID: <512E1CBE.5010605@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:48:30 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <512E0E4E.8060205@communistcode.co.uk> <512E0FA9.3030007@communistcode.co.uk> <512E10A8.2080407@communistcode.co.uk> <512E1184.1040202@communistcode.co.uk> <512E13DD.3070106@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: GCC + Texinfo 5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:05:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27/02/13 14:42, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: >> On 27/02/13 14:00, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>> On 27/02/13 13:56, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>> On 27/02/13 13:52, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>> On 27/02/13 13:46, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>>> As with the recent binutils texinfo5 compatibility I believe GCC now >>>>>> also has the same failings, please see attached log. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've had a quick look for patches but I am not at all familiar with the >>>>>> GCC development process and I came up empty handed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>> Ok, one patch found, there seems to be some @anchor problems too; I'll >>>>> see if I can dig anything up. >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-07/msg00045.html >>>>> >>>> Appologies, that isn't even for GCC :( >>>> >>> Ok, this is the patch; I'll look into trying to use it in the GCC recipes >>> but they're pretty complicated... >>> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/222861/ >> >> Ok, this doesn't apply cleanly and I can't unwind the patch trail to get to >> this state; if someone knows of a way to do that I would be grateful! >> >> > open a bug for it too https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3947 -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --