From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAvkN-0003rE-HU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:09:45 +0100 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2013 20:53:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,753,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="292863318" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.143]) ([10.255.12.143]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2013 20:53:12 -0800 Message-ID: <512EE2B8.3080709@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:53:12 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Seebach References: In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pseudo 1.5.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:10:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No Tarball yet? Did you give it to Michael H.? Sau! On 02/27/2013 01:19 PM, Peter Seebach wrote: > It turns out that I forgot the part where it would be useful to be > able to temporarily suppress the suppression of fsync()-type calls. > Also the documentation had bitrotted (no references to FASTOP or to > the fsync stuff, or to some other changes), so I fixed a few obvious > gaps. > > This should have no immediate functional change on anything in oe-core, > but it allows for specifying > PSEUDO_ALLOW_FSYNC=1 > and getting fsync behavior from that command. > > There's also a performance improvement in the case where NDEBUG is > defined, which is "never" in our context. > > This is a lowish-priority change for oe-core, and in any event I don't > believe the tarballs are up on the Yocto servers yet, but we need it > internally and paperwork's easier if I submit it and then backport it. > (I do recommmend it, though, because this makes it a LOT easier to > check whether the fsync behavior is affecting something.) > > The following changes since commit 8e69f0ea42505e8f703893e18d73658b83d3b046: > Constantin Musca (1): > augeas: change SRC_URI > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib seebs/pseudo151 > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=seebs/pseudo151 > > Peter Seebach (1): > Update pseudo to 1.5.1 > > .../pseudo/{pseudo_1.5.bb => pseudo_1.5.1.bb} | 4 ++-- > meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_git.bb | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/{pseudo_1.5.bb => pseudo_1.5.1.bb} (52%) > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >