On 28/02/13 06:59, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: >> On 27/02/13 14:42, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jack Mitchell >>> wrote: >>>> On 27/02/13 14:00, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>> On 27/02/13 13:56, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>>> On 27/02/13 13:52, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>>>> On 27/02/13 13:46, Jack Mitchell wrote: >>>>>>>> As with the recent binutils texinfo5 compatibility I believe GCC now >>>>>>>> also has the same failings, please see attached log. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've had a quick look for patches but I am not at all familiar with >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> GCC development process and I came up empty handed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, one patch found, there seems to be some @anchor problems too; I'll >>>>>>> see if I can dig anything up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-07/msg00045.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> Appologies, that isn't even for GCC :( >>>>>> >>>>> Ok, this is the patch; I'll look into trying to use it in the GCC >>>>> recipes >>>>> but they're pretty complicated... >>>>> >>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/222861/ >>>> >>>> Ok, this doesn't apply cleanly and I can't unwind the patch trail to get >>>> to >>>> this state; if someone knows of a way to do that I would be grateful! >>>> >>>> >>> open a bug for it too >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3947 > Please test > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/45255/ > > and report back No luck, please see attached. -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --