From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCYDC-0001J4-Fu for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:26:04 +0100 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2013 08:08:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,780,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="293324755" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.152]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2013 08:09:32 -0800 Message-ID: <5134C73C.2000300@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 08:09:32 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <1362224344.11004.14.camel@ted> <5133852E.2010504@linux.intel.com> <513394C2.6030004@linux.intel.com> <5134A4BD.9030201@windriver.com> <1362406238.29587.28.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1362406238.29587.28.camel@ted> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fully support ext3/ext4 rootfs generation X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:26:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/04/2013 06:10 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 21:42 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: >> >> On 03/04/2013 02:21 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/03/2013 09:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > >> Yes, we do have hard links in the rootfs, e.g: core-image-sato and >> core-image-sato-sdk: >> >> # The sato >> $ find core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs/ -type f -printf "%p %i %n\n" | grep -v '1$' >> core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/terminfo/v/vt200 26977609 2 >> core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/terminfo/v/vt220 26977609 2 >> core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/bin/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd 26978690 2 >> core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs/usr/bin/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-ld 26978690 2 > > What if the count was 11? or 21? I'm just mentioning we need to improve > that command! Yes a -v ' 1$' would be better. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel