From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UFCoO-0005ol-Cm for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:11:25 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2013 16:54:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,825,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="268882150" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.68]) ([10.255.13.68]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2013 16:54:43 -0700 Message-ID: <513E6EC3.7090905@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:54:43 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com References: <4293cea264609a122b9cc05831fe598fcb3ff677.1362702690.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> <957507c1d36185cf5c6a1ac9b5781c3344d5a40d.1362702690.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <957507c1d36185cf5c6a1ac9b5781c3344d5a40d.1362702690.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> Cc: dvhart@linux.intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: rename perf_3.4 to perf X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:11:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/07/2013 04:39 PM, tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so > it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with > the 3.8 kernel. > > Since the recipe isn't tied to a specific PV, and simply uses > whatever's in STAGING_KERNEL_DIR, there's no reason to add anything > else either to the bare PN, so just use that as the recipe name. > This did not quite work out correctly, since the package name has now gone backwards since the default PV for a recipe is 1.0 when nothing is set on the recipe file name. Is there a way to sort this out such that it picks up an incrementing PV from the kernel recipe? As it stands now, the PV has gone from 3.4 -> 1.0. Thanks for looking after this. Sau! > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/perf/{perf_3.4.bb => perf.bb} | 0 > 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-kernel/perf/{perf_3.4.bb => perf.bb} (100%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb > rename to meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb >