From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl ([178.33.81.99]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGF7V-0000Jv-5y for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:51:27 +0100 Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DA7CDD22E8; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:34:44 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (87-206-60-225.dynamic.chello.pl [87.206.60.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ABABD22B2; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:34:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5142343C.4070107@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:34:04 +0100 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Organization: Linaro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1363282893-19390-1-git-send-email-marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> <51421128.6090201@windriver.com> <5142148A.7010009@linaro.org> <5D166876-A7B9-4F53-A0DC-61DA13087097@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5D166876-A7B9-4F53-A0DC-61DA13087097@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add architecture files for AArch64 architecture. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:51:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 14.03.2013 21:24, Khem Raj pisze: >>> No, we do not use /lib64/ for AArch64. > > Thats under discussion I have seen threads and patches on gcc ml and > glibc ml about it. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00288.html > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2013-03/msg00125.html > > I would rather like to have lib64 but I guess multi arch guys will > not like it OK. With current state of binutils/eglibc/gcc-linaro as we have in OE we use /lib/ instead of /lib64/ directory. Once it got changed upstream I will adapt to it.