Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: SDK and external toolchain
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:03:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514829D6.3060607@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343332730.9574.4.camel@ted>

W dniu 26.07.2012 21:58, Richard Purdie pisze:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:32 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 7/26/12 1:14 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>> index 44284c3..f5fd4d7 100644
>>>>> --- a/meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass
>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass
>>>>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ toolchain_create_sdk_env_script_for_installer () {
>>>>>    #we get the cached site config in the runtime
>>>>>    TOOLCHAIN_CONFIGSITE_NOCACHE = "${@siteinfo_get_files(d, True)}"
>>>>>    TOOLCHAIN_CONFIGSITE_SYSROOTCACHE =
>>>>> "${STAGING_DATADIR}/${TARGET_SYS}_config_site.d"
>>>>> -TOOLCHAIN_NEED_CONFIGSITE_CACHE = "${TCLIBC} ncurses"
>>>>> +TOOLCHAIN_NEED_CONFIGSITE_CACHE = "ncurses"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is incorrect.. the CONFIGSITE_CACHE should be generated for the TCLIBC.
>>>> If you don't do that, then you will be running the same configure steps --
>>>> looking for basic glibc information over and over and over, causing a fairly
>>>> expensive performance penalty.
>>>
>>> No, he's right, this is a bug in toolchain-scripts.bbclass. We could
>>> work around it in the recipe via RPROVIDES_${PN}, but
>>> TOOLCHAIN_NEED_CONFIGSITE_CACHE feeds directly into task 'depends', so
>>> it's pulling in ${TCLIBC} explicitly rather than the more accurate
>>> 'virtual/libc'.
>>>
>>
>> The config site file though isn't called "virtual/libc".  My understanding what 
>> that all that variable did was set the list of config site files, but didn't 
>> directly affect the dependency mapping.  If it does, then there is a definite 
>> issue w/ dependency vs file mappings.
> 
> The trouble as I understand it is we need to know both the dependency
> name and the config/site cache name.
> 
> We'll probably have to change siteconfig.bbclass to generate libc_config
> instead of ${PN}_config (create an intermediate variable the libc
> recipes override).
> 
> We can then specify something like virtual/libc:libc in
> TOOLCHAIN_NEED_CONFIGSITE_CACHE. Of course that probably still won't
> work if you actually try and build meta-toolchain, we might just have to
> skip things that don't exist...

Issue is still present ;(




  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-19  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26  7:14 SDK and external toolchain Matthieu CRAPET
2012-07-26 16:37 ` Mark Hatle
2012-07-26 18:14   ` Chris Larson
2012-07-26 18:32     ` Mark Hatle
2012-07-26 19:58       ` Richard Purdie
2013-03-19  9:03         ` Marcin Juszkiewicz [this message]
2013-03-19 12:26           ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2012-07-27 13:24   ` Matthieu CRAPET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514829D6.3060607@linaro.org \
    --to=marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox