From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UMaqP-0006ud-JH for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:16:01 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2013 01:58:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,385,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="278925646" Received: from dell-desktop.rb.intel.com (HELO [10.237.105.59]) ([10.237.105.59]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2013 01:58:51 -0700 Message-ID: <51594C4F.4000703@intel.com> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:58:55 +0300 From: Radu Moisan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer References: <1364551510-8648-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> <20130329170003.GA7125@mx.loc> In-Reply-To: <20130329170003.GA7125@mx.loc> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] busybox: Upgrade to v1.21.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:16:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/29/2013 07:00 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:05:10PM +0200, Radu Moisan wrote: >> Removed obsolete patches >> Added a few new patches pending 1.21.1 >> *busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch >> *busybox-1.21.0-platform.patch >> *busybox-1.21.0-xz.patch >> >> Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan >> --- >> .../busybox-1.20.2/busybox-1.20.2-kernel_ver.patch | 28 - >> .../busybox-mkfs-minix-tests_bigendian.patch | 34 -- >> .../fix-for-spurious-testsuite-failure.patch | 27 - >> .../busybox/busybox-1.20.2/sys_resource.patch | 99 --- >> .../busybox/busybox-1.20.2/wget_dl_dir_fix.patch | 30 - >> .../B921600.patch | 0 >> .../busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch | 643 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> .../busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-platform.patch | 24 + >> .../busybox/busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-xz.patch | 84 +++ >> .../busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch | 0 >> .../busybox-udhcpc-no_deconfig.patch | 0 >> .../{busybox-1.20.2 => busybox-1.21.0}/defconfig | 0 >> .../get_header_tar.patch | 0 >> .../run-parts.in.usr-bin.patch | 6 +- >> .../stat-usr-bin.patch | 0 >> ...estsuite-du-du-k-works-fix-false-positive.patch | 0 >> .../watch.in.usr-bin.patch | 0 >> .../{busybox_1.20.2.bb => busybox_1.21.0.bb} | 17 +- >> 18 files changed, 762 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/busybox-1.20.2-kernel_ver.patch >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/busybox-mkfs-minix-tests_bigendian.patch >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/fix-for-spurious-testsuite-failure.patch >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/sys_resource.patch >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/wget_dl_dir_fix.patch >> rename meta/recipes-core/busybox/{busybox-1.20.2 => busybox-1.21.0}/B921600.patch (100%) > I wonder how this applies without fuzz as > it was applied upstream back in 2009: > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=e707a3000b2f6e2f684b6e85cd60590318d157c4 > >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-platform.patch >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-xz.patch >> rename meta/recipes-core/busybox/{busybox-1.20.2 => busybox-1.21.0}/busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch (100%) > I think this patch is not needed. I don't see any obvious reason to drop this, and while it looks safe to keep it, I'll go for the later option. Radu