From: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv@pseudoterminal.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: RFC: gstreamer 1.0 recipes
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 01:38:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5162038C.2020706@pseudoterminal.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2157 bytes --]
Hello all,
to start working with GStreamer 1.0 on several embedded platforms, I
decided to adapt the existing GStreamer recipes from danny for 1.0. Out
of this I created a layer, which is hosted at
https://github.com/dv1/meta-gstreamer1.0 .
I write this RFC, because I figure that GStreamer 1.0 support is already
on TODO lists of several people, and will eventually end up in OE-Core,
just like GStreamer 0.10 did. For this reason, I also didn't add it to
the layer index.
I built the packages for several platforms (cubox, beagleboard, imx6),
and they worked well. Since 1.0 has been designed to be able to coexist
with 0.10 in the same rootfs, I changed the naming convention for the
packages: they all start with "gstreamer1.0-" .
I also tried to reuse the existing patches. I was able to reuse three.
Several others are no longer necessary. Four are unclear to me, so I did
not port them:
* gstreamer: check_fix.patch (I could not reproduce the documented
problem), and gstregistrybin.c/.h (why are these present?)
* gst-plugins-base: configure.ac-fix-subparse-plugin.patch (not sure
what this is trying to fix, and this line does not exist in 1.0), and
gst-plugins-base-tremor.patch (again, works well without it)
gst-ffmpeg was replaced by gst-libav upstream. So was gst-openmax
(gst-omx is its successor). gst-omx has special support for the
Raspberry Pi and its custom OpenMax IL implementation. The recipe is
designed in a way that allows for setting the target to something like
"rpi", and the recipe then sets the PACKAGE_ARCH automatically to
MACHINE_ARCH. However, I wasn't able to test it on an RPi yet, since I
do not have one. I will get access to one in a few days.
I am also considering some kind of autodetection for when yasm and
liborc are available (for example, because meta-oe was added to
bblayers.conf), and then switches on Orc and enables yasm in gst-libav.
Or better yet, if libav is available as a recipe, it lets gst-libav use
it instead of its internal copy. These autodetections would improve
performance significantly.
Thoughts?
cheers,
Carlos
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2799 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-07 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-07 23:38 Carlos Rafael Giani [this message]
2013-04-08 7:57 ` RFC: gstreamer 1.0 recipes Koen Kooi
2013-04-08 9:35 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-08 10:47 ` Koen Kooi
2013-04-08 11:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-04-08 11:14 ` Carlos Rafael Giani
2013-04-08 9:36 ` Carlos Rafael Giani
2013-04-15 1:21 ` Carlos Rafael Giani
2013-04-08 13:39 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-08 23:00 ` Carlos Rafael Giani
2013-04-09 9:32 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-09 9:50 ` Carlos Rafael Giani
2013-04-09 10:02 ` Burton, Ross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5162038C.2020706@pseudoterminal.org \
--to=dv@pseudoterminal.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox