From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ptmx.org ([178.63.28.110]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UPVSg-0007LD-VB for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:07:39 +0200 Received: from [192.168.178.14] (chello080108009040.14.11.vie.surfer.at [80.108.9.40]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D47F21303; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5163E458.1080709@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:50:16 +0200 From: Carlos Rafael Giani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130403 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <5162038C.2020706@pseudoterminal.org> <51634C0A.5040300@pseudoterminal.org> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: RFC: gstreamer 1.0 recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:07:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-04-09 11:32, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 9 April 2013 00:00, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: >> thinking about this whole issue I began to wonder: why is gstreamer in >> oe-core and not in meta-multimedia? >> wouldnt it be easier then to move liborc into meta-multimedia as well? >> Or is gstreamer considered an essential component for many installations, >> thus justifying its presence in oe-core? > Yes, it's common enough, and I'd support moving liborc to oe-core in 1.5. > > There's always a grey area for oe-core verses meta-something, but > there's no point in oe-core just consisting of gcc and libc. > > Ross Okay, sounds good. But just liborc? Or yasm as well? yasm is crucial for ffmpeg and libav. Carlos