From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43] helo=owm.eumx.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UUIFm-00027Z-Qh for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <51754CC4.9010604@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:44:20 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130403 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <51754581.3090005@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: systemd post-install failure X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:02:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 22/04/13 15:40, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 22 April 2013 15:13, Jack Mitchell wrote: >> Booting master today I had a systemd fault. Enabling debugging I captured >> the (attached) output. The gist of which is: >> >> So, looking into systemd-system-update-generator, it seems this is what >> takes card of the post install scripts, which I know we're having problems >> with. > Not quite - the system update generator would be used if we were using > systemd's native systemd update protocol, which we're not. This > generator shouldn't do anything unless you've got a symlink > /system-update (see > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/SystemUpdates for the > details). > > Ross Ah, ok then, I don't have a /system-update. So square one, any ideas why this would have suddenly flagged up? I was building and booting fine on Wed/Thurs. That was the only useful bit of the debug log I could determine... -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --