Re: dylan: meta-toolchain and u-boot : "cannot find -lgcc"

[Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>]

On 4/26/13 9:41 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Le Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:51:58 -0500,
> Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> a écrit :
>> On 4/26/13 2:26 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
>>> this can be fixed by installing the sdk to it's standard path
>>> (/usr/local/oecore-x86_64/ in the present case).
>>>
>>> Is that an expected behaviour (as the sdk is primarly designed to build
>>> applications) or can that be fixed during the sdk relocation ?
>>
>> When you use the SDK, you need to be sure to source the SDK environment setup.
>> Once you do that, pass to the compiler/linker the included CFLAGS and LDFLAGS as
>> specified in that environment file.
>
> of course I did source it (and forget to put it in the email as that
> was obvious to me, sorry).
>
>> They should end up passing at some point a --sysroot=... and that will tell gcc
>> where the libraries and headers are for linking.  Without the --sysroot= option,
>> the compiler has no choice but to look for it's original compilation directory.
>>
> true, that's why I provided the step to reproduce and said "as the
> sdk is primarly designed to build applications" and that's certainly
> why we get this problem : for linux & u-boot we can't use the LDFLAGS
> as set by the environment script else we get :
>
> for u-boot :
> arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd: unrecognized option '-Wl,-O1'
> so we need to pass LDFLAGS="" which then leads to :
> arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd: cannot find -lgcc
> if and only if the sdk was relocated.
> (and I also get the error even if I add LDFLAGS="
> --sysroot=/path_to/oecore-x86_64/sysroots/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi"
> so this seems specific to -lgcc)
>
> for linux :
> arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-O1'
> so here again we need to pass LDFLAGS="" which leads to a successful
> build as the build is not using lgcc.

I see, it's using ld instead of gcc for linking.  AFAIK though, you really 
shouldn't be using -lgcc in either uboot or linux for any platform.  That seems 
suspicious to me.

It's reasonable to file a bug in the Yocto Project bugzilla, but I'm not sure 
what kind of resolution we'll get.

--Mark

> Eric
>