From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ptmx.org ([178.63.28.110]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZfQm-000806-QL for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 12:47:37 +0200 Received: from [10.1.14.186] (83-64-248-68.inzersdorf.xdsl-line.inode.at [83.64.248.68]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D82A21013; Tue, 7 May 2013 12:29:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5188D791.1070505@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 12:29:37 +0200 From: Carlos Rafael Giani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1367787030-5056-1-git-send-email-dv@pseudoterminal.org> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gstreamer: Fixed dependency problem with -meta packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:47:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/07/2013 11:55 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 5 May 2013 21:50, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: >> Installing the gstreamer -meta packages was not possible, because the >> -apps and -glib packages were missing. Allowing for empty -apps/glib >> packages fixes this. > From what I can tell there's only one -apps package > (gst-plugins-base-apps) and one -glib package (gst-plugins-bad-glib), > so why not add those extra dependencies in -base and -bad explicitly > instead of creating empty packages for no reason? > > Ross True, however I wonder if somebody relies on these packages being there. Is it acceptable to break compatibility here?