From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl ([178.33.81.99]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZyNz-0001BN-UN for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 09:02:00 +0200 Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 28E9CD20DD; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:43:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (87-206-60-225.dynamic.chello.pl [87.206.60.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3321D20DD; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:42:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5189F404.8090300@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 08:43:16 +0200 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Organization: Linaro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <515ED999.9040100@communistcode.co.uk> <515EFD76.2090009@communistcode.co.uk> <0CA85874-9D57-4E2A-B47D-79DAAD3E78A6@gmail.com> <51628545.6050106@communistcode.co.uk> <5162888A.90502@communistcode.co.uk> <6488B785-095B-4077-96A6-0E2004900C68@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6488B785-095B-4077-96A6-0E2004900C68@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org layer" , Discussion of the angstrom distribution development Subject: Re: gcc-cross-initial Failure (is a meta-aarch64 screw up) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 07:02:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 08.05.2013 04:23, Khem Raj pisze: > This seems totally wrong to me to since it overrides recipes in > subtle ways and does not document it anywhere > > firstly, README is not there and as it seems its a BSP layer but it > has much more than a BSP metadata in it. even then if it needed a new > toolchain then it should have used different names for includes like > meta-linaro-toolchain does. > > if it needed to enhance existing recipes from OE-Core or reuse them > then it should have included them as it is and tweaked with bbappend > or created new recipes itself for aarch64 compiler tools. > > I will leave this to meta-linaro devs to sort out and let it play > better with rest of layers meanwhile I will propose to disable > meta-aarch64 in angstrom. I will sort it out today.