From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UboeM-0004DL-If for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:02:43 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2013 01:44:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,660,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="333137872" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.238]) ([10.255.12.238]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2013 01:44:18 -0700 Message-ID: <5190A7E2.2000804@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:44:18 +0300 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <1368189198-1294-1-git-send-email-jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com> <3529451.hQA8zCVn47@helios> <51909DB8.3060407@linux.intel.com> <11599561.3zUhJSzPUZ@helios> In-Reply-To: <11599561.3zUhJSzPUZ@helios> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enable VPN support in ConnMan X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:03:11 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:03:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2013 11:33 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 13 May 2013 11:00:56 Saul Wold wrote: >> On 05/12/2013 10:55 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> On Sunday 12 May 2013 19:54:50 Phil Blundell wrote: >>>> On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 08:40 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >>>>> On 05/12/2013 06:27 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>> I think so, it'd be good to have it in oe-core and allow use of vpn :) >>>>> >>>>> I would like to see what the full dependency set looks like for these, >>>>> clearly there is the vpnc, openvpn, l2tp and pptp recipes, but what else >>>>> and what licenses are they under. >>>> >>>> I don't think we necessarily want openvpn, l2tpd and suchlike in >>>> oe-core. None of those things seem very "core" to me (in an embedded >>>> context) and testing them seems like it would be a bit of a challenge. >>> >>> I agree, these don't belong in OE-Core. We already have them in meta- >>> networking. >> >> This is what I get for replying to an email while traveling overseas and >> not being 100% clear about my points. >> >> I was more interested in the dependencies then actually thinking about >> including them in OE-Core,that was not my intent. >> >> This would would allow us to better understand if those recipes not in >> meta-networking could be moved from meta-oe to meta-networking. >> Currently, I think vpnc and pptp are in meta-networking, not the other 2. > > They are all in meta-networking (xl2tpd, pptp-linux and vpnc have always been > there, openvpn got moved in mid-April). > I guess I did not have the latest meta-oe, I was looking in the wrong place again! Looks like this can work out. Sau! > Cheers, > Paul >