From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UcsMT-0004mP-5X for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:12:31 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r4G6sBKt028748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 23:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.230] (128.224.162.230) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Wed, 15 May 2013 23:54:10 -0700 Message-ID: <51948307.5070608@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:56:07 +0800 From: Jesse Zhang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.230] Subject: should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 07:12:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We've accumulated quite a few perl modules and would like to contribute some/all of them to oe-core. But I think we'd better ask how everyone thinks before doing so, since the number of the modules are pretty large, and the policy may as well apply to python/ruby packages. Most of the modules are simple cpan recipes. They are easy to maintain, but do consume *some* manpower. I think there are a few alternatives. 1. decide on each module on a case-by-case basis. 2. keep all of them in some special layer other than oe-core. 3. everyone maintain what they need in-house. None of them seems perfect. Is there already some policy? jesse