From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from r-finger.com ([178.79.160.5]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ucufv-00024F-Kk for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:40:40 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host86-137-102-112.range86-137.btcentralplus.com [86.137.102.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E9EC952B for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:22:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <5194A550.4020006@r-finger.com> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:22:24 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <518A6B25.5000108@r-finger.com> <1368639038.18324.6.camel@ted> <1671648.4UWfFTD1eS@helios> In-Reply-To: <1671648.4UWfFTD1eS@helios> Subject: Re: proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:40:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 15/05/13 19:24, Paul Eggleton wrote: > However, I do think it's important for us to try to work together for the > benefit of everyone, I entirely agree with this; I certainly don't want to maintain a public meta-clutter layer that competes with, or is perceived to compete with some other recipes or efforts (oe-core or otherwise), this benefits no one, least of all anyone interested in being just a 'user' of these packages. Tomas -- http://sleepfive.com