From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EA560897 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 05:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r4L5HtH9014068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 22:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.169] (128.224.162.169) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 20 May 2013 22:17:53 -0700 Message-ID: <519B037E.5020700@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:17:50 +0800 From: zhangxiao User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <519AE3E1.8040404@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <519AE3E1.8040404@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.169] Subject: Re: How about separate client only mode from nfs-utils? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 05:17:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2013年05月21日 11:02, zhangxiao wrote: > Hi Experts, > > I find current nfs-utils just support client+server mode. No client only > mode support. Yes, we can say the client can be used normally in this full > function mode. But... I wonder if we have any plan to make it? I think only > script modification is OK. To start necessary daemon for client side only. > Especially the rpc.statd that needed for both client and server side. Or we can only use nfs client with "-o nolock". Thanks Xiao > How about your opinions and plan? > > Thanks a lot! > Xiao > >