The answer seems to be 'yes'.On 28 May 2013 15:39, <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> wrote:
From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
The following changes since commit 21089515bd18ba18e86ec8f72ff8141b9fb1dea8:
ref-manual: Added xmlto and dblatex packages for docs (2013-05-22 17:23:41 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib ChenQi/tinylogin-busybox
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=ChenQi/tinylogin-busybox
Chen Qi (2):
packagegroup-core-boot: use busybox as the default login manager
busybox: enable login/password commands by default
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/defconfig | 26 ++++++++++----------
.../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb | 2 +-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
After switching from tinylogin to busybox, the following commands that used to be provided by tinylogin are provided by other packages instead of busybox:
-/bin/login [shadow]
-/sbin/getty [util-linux-agetty]
-/usr/bin/passwd [shadow]-/usr/bin/su [shadow]
Perhaps util-linux-agetty and shadow packages have higher alternatives priority?
Regards,Jonathan