From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl [178.33.81.99]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935DC6A567 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B3E7ED22DE; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:04:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (87-206-60-225.dynamic.chello.pl [87.206.60.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCB66D22CD for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:03:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51AE4820.5010606@juszkiewicz.com.pl> Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:03:44 +0200 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <20130604195725.GH18597@timesys.com> In-Reply-To: <20130604195725.GH18597@timesys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 OpenPGP: id=117A251E Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-cortexa5.inc: add tune file for cortex-a5, based on a7 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:04:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 04.06.2013 21:57, Andy Voltz pisze: > I just tried this solution with my vybrid cortex-a5 build. The only issue is a > parse error on ${CORTEX_ID} here: > > TUNEVALID[cortex${CORTEX_ID}] = "Enable Cortex-${CORTEX_NAME} specific > > I amended the changes so that each tune-cortexa5.inc (for example) looks like: > > +CORTEX_ID = "a5" > + > +TUNEVALID[cortexa5] = "Enable Cortex-A5 specific processor optimizations" > + > +require conf/machine/include/tune-cortex.inc > > I didn't think it was worth having a CORTEX_NAME if TUNEVALID does not parse.. Agree. > My only other thought is perhaps tune-cortex.inc should be called > tune-cortexa.inc? It seems like the m series is a different animal. Agree as well. M/R to be exact. > What do you think?