From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4056A687 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2013 10:58:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,853,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="352170153" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.2]) ([10.255.13.2]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2013 10:57:23 -0700 Message-ID: <51B8B683.7020402@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:57:23 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Voltz References: <1371055081-15301-1-git-send-email-andy.voltz@timesys.com> <51B8A870.6040900@linux.intel.com> <20130612171354.GC12032@timesys.com> In-Reply-To: <20130612171354.GC12032@timesys.com> Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-cortexa*.inc: fix tunings for cortex a5, a7, a8, a9, a15 machines. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:57:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/12/2013 10:13 AM, Andy Voltz wrote: > Hi Saul, > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:57:20PM -0400, Saul Wold wrote: >> On 06/12/2013 09:38 AM, Andy Voltz wrote: >>> Using CORTEX_ID variable reference in the tuning overrides did not work. >>> This reverts those changes, and adds a tuning file for the cortex-a5. >>> >>> Revert "tune-cortexa5.inc: Add tune file for cortex-a5" >>> Revert "tune-cortexa.inc: create a common include for cortex-a armv7a tuning" >>> >> Andy, does this patch supersede your -mtune not -mcpu patch? I seem to >> have some trouble applying this patch. >> > > Yes. Sorry I thought that patch was NACK/dead. > >> It might be best to provide a series that includes the reverts with >> appropriate commit messages. >> > > Sure, I can send as a series. > Don't worry about it, seems RP already merged it into master, I must have had too much junk in my Master_under_test branch and had not reverted the right stuff. Sau! > Regards >