Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] sanity.bbclass: Check for the known broken version of make
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:03:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C0D94F.7090509@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C0CC71.3030205@windriver.com>

On 6/18/13 4:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> Just an FYI -- this fails (correctly I might add) on many Fedora systems.  It
> turns out that their version of make 3.82 is only partially patched.

 From the best that I can tell, Fedora 16 and newer are all broken.  (And I 
checked OE-Core, and it's also missing the second part of the fix.  I should be 
sending a patch for that soon.)

Fedora Bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975597

If necessary we can relax the check I added by removing the 'space' on the 
makefile_test.a: ... line.

Obviously it hasn't been failing for the oe-core (and likely meta-oe) builds. 
But it is still broken.

--Mark

> The specific check we look for looks for two different problems.  The first is a
> target that includes target(dep1 dep2 dep3).  The second is a target that starts
> with leading spaces.
>
>   From what I can tell, most Fedora 3.82 versions are patched for the first
> problem, but not the second.
>
> There are other problems with 3.82, but this patch appears to detect the most
> broken of 3.82 versions in common use.
>
> (And no, this is no longer an RFC.  I think this is the correct patch!)
>
> --Mark
>
> On 6/18/13 3:17 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> See GNU Savannah bug 30612 -- make 3.82 is known to be broken.
>>
>> A number of vendors are providing a modified version, so checking
>> for just the version string is not enough.  We also need to check
>> if the patch for the issue has been applied.  We use a modified
>> version of the reproduced to check for the issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>    meta/classes/sanity.bbclass | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>    1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
>> index 3b9934b..012c40d 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
>> @@ -336,6 +336,41 @@ def check_gcc_march(sanity_data):
>>
>>        return result
>>
>> +# Unpatched versions of make 3.82 are known to be broken.  See GNU Savannah Bug 30612.
>> +# Use a modified reproducer from http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30612 to validate.
>> +def check_make_version(sanity_data, loosever):
>> +    status, result = oe.utils.getstatusoutput("make --version")
>> +    if status != 0:
>> +        return "Unable to execute make --version, exit code %s\n" % status
>> +    version = result.split()[2]
>> +    if loosever(version) == loosever("3.82"):
>> +        # Construct a test file
>> +        f = open("makefile_test", "w")
>> +        f.write("makefile_test.a: makefile_test_a.c makefile_test_b.c makefile_test.a( makefile_test_a.c makefile_test_b.c)\n")
>> +        f.write("\n")
>> +        f.write("makefile_test_a.c:\n")
>> +        f.write("	touch $@\n")
>> +        f.write("\n")
>> +        f.write("makefile_test_b.c:\n")
>> +        f.write("	touch $@\n")
>> +        f.close()
>> +
>> +        # Check if make 3.82 has been patched
>> +        status,result = oe.utils.getstatusoutput("make -f makefile_test")
>> +
>> +        os.remove("makefile_test")
>> +        if os.path.exists("makefile_test_a.c"):
>> +            os.remove("makefile_test_a.c")
>> +        if os.path.exists("makefile_test_b.c"):
>> +            os.remove("makefile_test_b.c")
>> +        if os.path.exists("makefile_test.a"):
>> +            os.remove("makefile_test.a")
>> +
>> +        if status != 0:
>> +            return "Your version of make 3.82 is broken. Please revert to 3.81 or install a patched version.\n"
>> +    return None
>> +
>> +
>>    # Tar version 1.24 and onwards handle overwriting symlinks correctly
>>    # but earlier versions do not; this needs to work properly for sstate
>>    def check_tar_version(sanity_data, loosever):
>> @@ -407,6 +442,10 @@ def check_sanity(sanity_data):
>>            messages = messages + 'Please set a MACHINE in your local.conf or environment\n'
>>            machinevalid = False
>>
>> +    makemsg = check_make_version(sanity_data, LooseVersion)
>> +    if makemsg:
>> +        messages = messages + makemsg
>> +
>>        tarmsg = check_tar_version(sanity_data, LooseVersion)
>>        if tarmsg:
>>            messages = messages + tarmsg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 20:17 [PATCH 1/1 v2] sanity.bbclass: Check for the known broken version of make Mark Hatle
2013-06-18 21:09 ` Mark Hatle
2013-06-18 22:03   ` Mark Hatle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C0D94F.7090509@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox