From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAF5609B9 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r5L22iZI007026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.176.88] (128.224.176.88) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:02:41 -0700 Message-ID: <51C3B43C.8040707@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:02:36 +0800 From: jhuang0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <1371726864.20823.227.camel@ted> <51C2EBA0.8070804@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <51C2EBA0.8070804@linux.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dbus: move libdbus-1.so* to base_libdir X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:02:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/20/2013 7:46 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 06/20/2013 04:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:39 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> On 20 June 2013 11:36, wrote: >>>> From: Jackie Huang >>>> >>>> move libdbus-1.so* to base_libdir to kill a warning: >>>> >>>> WARNING: QA Issue: lib32-consolekit: /lib/security/ >>>> pam_ck_connector.so, installed in the base_prefix, >>>> requires a shared library under exec_prefix (/usr): >>>> libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3 (0xdead3000) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li >>>> Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang >>> >>> More and more and more libraries move. Do we *really* need to support >>> split-usr? Have you audited all of the udev helpers yet? >> >> I have to admit I'm not happy with the piece by piece approach this is >> taking. We're going to end up with nearly everything moving to >> base_libdir at this rate. If we're going to do this, I want someone to >> come up with a definitive list of what needs to move before any more of >> these merge. >> > And this should be checked with various DISTRO_FEATURES such as pam > (enabled/disabled) and systemd (enabled/disabled), not just one > variation, please be sure to list what your testing matrix is. I tested with DISTRO_FEATURES 'pam' (enabled/disabled) and 'systemd' (enabled/disabled) and WARN_QA = "unsafe-references-in-binaries unsafe-references-in-scripts", and I have sent a v3. If you are agree to merge, please merge the v3 one, thanks! Thanks, Jackie > > Thanks > Sau! > >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> > > -- Jackie Huang WIND RIVER | China Development Center MSN:jackielily@hotmail.com Tel: +86 8477 8594 Mobile: +86 138 1027 4745