From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sanity.bbclass: Check for the known broken version of make
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:09:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C8C398.1070908@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372085149-30510-2-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com>
On 06/24/2013 07:45 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> See GNU Savannah bug 30612 -- make 3.82 is known to be broken.
>
> A number of vendors are providing a modified version, so checking
> for just the version string is not enough. We also need to check
> if the patch for the issue has been applied. We use a modified
> version of the reproduced to check for the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/sanity.bbclass | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
Seems this needs a rebase since RP also changed sanity.bbclass recently.
Sau!
> diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> index 7f95f31..dc251a1 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> @@ -336,6 +336,41 @@ def check_gcc_march(sanity_data):
>
> return result
>
> +# Unpatched versions of make 3.82 are known to be broken. See GNU Savannah Bug 30612.
> +# Use a modified reproducer from http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30612 to validate.
> +def check_make_version(sanity_data, loosever):
> + status, result = oe.utils.getstatusoutput("make --version")
> + if status != 0:
> + return "Unable to execute make --version, exit code %s\n" % status
> + version = result.split()[2]
> + if loosever(version) == loosever("3.82"):
> + # Construct a test file
> + f = open("makefile_test", "w")
> + f.write("makefile_test.a: makefile_test_a.c makefile_test_b.c makefile_test.a( makefile_test_a.c makefile_test_b.c)\n")
> + f.write("\n")
> + f.write("makefile_test_a.c:\n")
> + f.write(" touch $@\n")
> + f.write("\n")
> + f.write("makefile_test_b.c:\n")
> + f.write(" touch $@\n")
> + f.close()
> +
> + # Check if make 3.82 has been patched
> + status,result = oe.utils.getstatusoutput("make -f makefile_test")
> +
> + os.remove("makefile_test")
> + if os.path.exists("makefile_test_a.c"):
> + os.remove("makefile_test_a.c")
> + if os.path.exists("makefile_test_b.c"):
> + os.remove("makefile_test_b.c")
> + if os.path.exists("makefile_test.a"):
> + os.remove("makefile_test.a")
> +
> + if status != 0:
> + return "Your version of make 3.82 is broken. Please revert to 3.81 or install a patched version.\n"
> + return None
> +
> +
> # Tar version 1.24 and onwards handle overwriting symlinks correctly
> # but earlier versions do not; this needs to work properly for sstate
> def check_tar_version(sanity_data, loosever):
> @@ -407,6 +442,10 @@ def check_sanity(sanity_data):
> messages = messages + 'Please set a MACHINE in your local.conf or environment\n'
> machinevalid = False
>
> + makemsg = check_make_version(sanity_data, LooseVersion)
> + if makemsg:
> + messages = messages + makemsg
> +
> tarmsg = check_tar_version(sanity_data, LooseVersion)
> if tarmsg:
> messages = messages + tarmsg
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-24 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-24 14:45 [PATCH 0/3] Update the sanity check and make Mark Hatle
2013-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] sanity.bbclass: Check for the known broken version of make Mark Hatle
2013-06-24 22:09 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2013-06-25 2:06 ` Mark Hatle
2013-06-25 11:20 ` Martin Jansa
2013-06-25 14:12 ` Mark Hatle
2013-06-25 14:26 ` Martin Jansa
2013-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] make: Fix second part of bug Savannah 30612 Mark Hatle
2013-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] buildtools-tarball: Add nativesdk-make Mark Hatle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C8C398.1070908@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox