From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE046AA07 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 07:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r5S7Z30j018007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.224] (128.224.162.224) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:35:02 -0700 Message-ID: <51CD3C69.7010803@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:34:01 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <51CA5F8E.9070504@windriver.com> <51CB1145.4060009@linux.intel.com> <51CCEF2E.6070800@windriver.com> <20130628065050.GJ3261@jama> In-Reply-To: <20130628065050.GJ3261@jama> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] make DESCRIPTION support newline X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 07:35:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/28/2013 02:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:04:30AM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: >> >> >> On 06/27/2013 12:05 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >>> On 06/25/2013 08:27 PM, Robert Yang wrote: >>>> >>>> Ping for this one. >>>> >>> Robert, >>> >>> There were some comments on your patch set and I think an issue with the ipk one. >>> >> >> Hi Saul, >> >> I think that you meant Martin's comment on the ipk one, Phil had explained to >> him, and it worked well with the opkg-utils. > > I've confused DESCRIPTION and SUMMARY, but I was talking about this > change: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/opkg-utils/commit/?id=7f0a7976c29b34feaf4f6b00f0a63626614d1c7d > > And longer description here: > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2012-March/007851.html > > So please make sure that your change doesn't break it, but with this > applied it shouldn't. > Yes, I had taken the patch, and it doesn't break the opkg-utils. // Robert