From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from r-finger.com (r-finger.com [178.79.160.5]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623006AA07 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 11:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host86-137-86-109.range86-137.btcentralplus.com [86.137.86.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4090E952D for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:58:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <51D56366.1080906@r-finger.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:58:30 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <4e815a29c0d069823211ba33645f3b08ae968bfd.1372933905.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] xuser-account: create separate recipe for xuser creation X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 11:58:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/07/13 12:29, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 4 July 2013 11:58, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: >> +USERADD_PARAM_${PN} = "--create-home \ >> + --groups video,tty,audio,input,shutdown \ >> + --user-group xuser" > > I'm not liking the name "xuser" but unless someone has a much better > idea right now we can change that later. oeuser? > Thinking about places where the xuser is used in other recipes (i.e. > connman for ACLs), can anyone see a problem with adding xuser to the > "users" group so those ACLS can use group membership instead of user > name? Yes, I think group would be preferred option. Tomas -- http://sleepfive.com